The Winning Strategy and the Risk Management of The Indonesia Navy Defense in Anticipating the VUCA Environment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64515/irdhijtans.v2i2.159Keywords:
Grand Strategy, The Indonesia Navy, VUCA, EnvironmentAbstract
The strategic planning and defense systems in Indonesia present a fascinating subject for discussion. The aim of this article is to ensure that all parties involved in defense design are more conscious of the developments within a VUCA (Volatile, Uncertain, Complex, and Ambiguous) strategic environment. This article used the descriptive method with in-depth elaboration analysis. The result shows that developing a grand strategy to achieve victory, several key considerations must be taken are Evaluating risks and uncertainties, Analyzing the distinction between security and safety, Interpreting the concept of victory as encompassing peace, not just success in conflict, Basing effective strategies for addressing threats and vulnerabilities on thorough research, Identifying and addressing threats and vulnerabilities are crucial for maintaining global stability and peace. We have to consider the VUCA environment in making the grand strategy. Volatility refers to a dynamic, non-linear system where causes and effects can lead to imbalances. Uncertainty refers to unpredictable conditions that necessitate Indonesian Navy careful approach in planning defense strategies and determining the appropriate structure for the armed forces. Complexity illustrates the patterns of past events but cannot predict their recurrence. Ambiguity refers to an uncertain situation that requires the Indonesian Navy to be prepared to act if conditions escalate to a more dangerous level than anticipated. The Grand Strategy of the Indonesian Navy Defense must take into account the VUCA Strategic Environment, which encompasses Volatility, Uncertainty, Complexity, and Ambiguity. Understanding the complexity of VUCA is vital as it enhances organizational self-awareness, particularly within the military
References
Authored Book
Chermack, T. J. (2011). Scenario planning in organizations: how to create, use, and assess scenarios. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Dearlove, D. (2023). Certain Uncertainty: Leading with Agility and Resilience in an Unpredictable World. John Wiley & Sons.
Johnson, D. D., & Tierney, D. (2006). Failing to win: Perceptions of victory and defeat in international politics. Harvard University Press.
Kagan, F. (2007). Finding the target: The transformation of American military policy. Encounter Books.
Rosen, S. P. (1991). Winning the next war: Innovation and the modern military. Cornell University Press.
Sachs, J. (2012). Winning the story wars: Why those who tell (and live) the best stories will rule the future. Harvard Business Press.
Seybolt, T. B. (2007). Humanitarian military intervention: the conditions for success and failure. Oxford University Press, USA.
Sullivan, P. L. (2012). Who wins?: Predicting strategic success and failure in armed conflict. Oxford University Press.
Vego, M. N. (2009). Joint operational warfare: Theory and practice. Government Printing Office.
Whitehead, A. N. (2010). Process and reality. Simon and Schuster.
Internet Source
Roberts, B. (2020). On Theories of Victory, Red and Blue. Livermore Papers on Global Security, 7.https://cgsr.llnl.gov/sites/cgsr/files/2024-08/CGSR-LivermorePaper7.pdf
Journal Articles
Barrera, M. S. (2024). Strategies For Enhancing Military Leadership: A Case Study Of Vuca Prime In The Colombian Aerospace Force. Journal of Defense Resources Management (JoDRM), 15(1), 95-108.
Du, J., & Chen, Z. (2018). Applying Organizational Ambidexterity in strategic management under a “VUCA” environment: Evidence from high tech companies in China. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 2(1), 42-52.
Fazekas, F. (2022). Application of Artificial Intelligence in Military Operations Planning. AARMS–Academic and Applied Research in Military and Public Management Science, 21(2), 41-54.
Lubowiecki-Vikuk, A., Budzanowska-Drzewiecka, M., Borzyszkowski, J., & Taheri, B. (2023). Critical reflection on VUCA in tourism and hospitality marketing activities. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 35(8), 2983-3005.
Shortland, N., Alison, L., & Barrett-Pink, C. (2018). Military (in) decision-making process: A psychological framework to examine decision inertia in military operations. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 19(6), 752-772.
Spain, E., & Woodruff, T. (2023). The applied strategic leadership process: Setting direction in a VUCA world. Journal of Character and Leadership Development, 10(1), 47-57.
Sun, W., & Wang, J. (2025). Measuring combat effectiveness: a novel method based on two-dimensional frontline advancement rate. International Politics, 1-25.
Zamani, H., & Soudane, J. A. (2022). Strategic leadership and VUCA environment (volatile, uncertain, complex and ambiguous). Revue Internationale Des Sciences De Gestion, 5(1).
Proceedings
Kiluange, F., Rouco, C., & Silva, A. P. (2024, November). Military leadership in a VUCA environment and BANI Scenario: a systematic literature review. In European Conference on Management, Leadership & Governance (pp. 641-662). Academic Conferences International Limited.
Maftei, V. L., & Radu, R. E. (2024). Analysis Of The Current Security Environment Through VUCA. In International Scientific Conference" Strategies XXI" (Vol. 20, pp. 286-292). " Carol I" National Defence University.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Arip Supriyadi, Budi Setyoko

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




